mentioned case crime number. As such, applicant is being falsely prosecuted in afore-mentioned case crime number. Allegations made in the F.I.R. are false and concocted. As such applicant is being falsely prosecuted in aforementioned case crime number. It is then contended that applicant-Guddu is a man of clean antecedents inasmuch as he has no criminal history to his credit except the present one. After lodging aforementioned F.I.R. giving rise to this application for bail, a case under the provisions of Gangster Act has been lodged against applicant-Guddu. It is next contended that prosecutrix is major and she is a consenting party. Applicant is in custody since 19.11.2019. As such, he has undergone more than two years and four months of incarceration. In case applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and shall co-operate with trial. It is also contended that since the chargesheet has already been submitted against applicant therefore the evidence sought to be relied upon by the prosecution against applicant, stands crystallised. As such, custodial arrest of applicant is not absolutely necessary during the course of trial. On the cumulative strength of aforesaid, he submits that applicant be enlarged on bail.
