Mohd. Ahmad v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as no representative appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the matter.
What the court decided
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22882 of 2022
Applicant :- Mohd. Ahmad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rizwan Ullah Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the applicant to press this application.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Accordingly, the present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 8.9.2022 Nitin Verma
Digitally signed by NITIN KUMAR VERMA Date: 2022.09.08 17:45:47 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mohd. Ahmad
Coram
Deepak Verma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/22882/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court