The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad considered a second bail application in a murder case. Finding no new grounds for bail, the court rejected the application and directed the trial court to expedite the trial within six months.
Bail application rejected; Trial directed to conclude within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 21853 of 2022
Applicant :- Mohd. Sazid Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Niraj Kumar Tiwari,Perdeep Kumar Vishnoi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
3. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 117 of 2019, under Sections 304 I.P.C., Police Station Nehtaur, District Bijnor.
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A., and after perusing the averments made in the present bail application as well as rejection order, this Court is of the opinion, that learned counsel for the applicant could not point out any new ground for grant of bail to the applicant.
5. Accordingly, the bail application filed on behalf of the applicant is hereby rejected .
Order Date :- 18.10.2022 Arti
Digitally signed by ARTI SHARMA Date: 2022.10.21 10:34:44 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether fresh grounds exist to enlarge the applicant on bail in a charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
Whether the bail application should be allowed in the absence of new grounds.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd. Sazid
State of U.P.
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
