Allowed

Pradeep @ Banti Yadav v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC28 Jun 2022BAIL/20209/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delivering on a bail application under the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2021, the Allahabad High Court granted bail to the applicant, noting previous bail grants in related cases and directing execution of bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was ordered to be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties with specific conditions.

Pradeep @ Banti Yadav Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 5

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20209 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Pradeep @ Banti Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Amrendra Pratap Singh,Gaurav Singh Tomar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶6

By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No. 334 of 2021, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Kotwali Jalaun , district Jalaun and is in jail since 09.12.2021, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.

¶7

An first information report dated 04.12.2021 was lodged under Section 3 (1) U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 alleging that the applicant alongwith others formed a gang and have committed various offences.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been implicated in the present case on the basis of his involvement in one criminal case mentioned in gang chart, copy whereof has been annexed on page no. 22 of the Bail application. He next submitted that the applicant has been granted bail in the criminal cases shown against him in the gang chart. Copy of one bail orders have been annexed on page no.41 onward of the paper book, hence the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶9

The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A. However he does not dispute the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in the case mentioned against him in the gang chart.

¶10

Keeping in view, the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail during the pendency of the trial.

¶11

Let the applicant Pradeep @ Banti Yadav involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on executing a personal

¶12

bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶13

The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶14

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶15

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶16

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶17

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶18

Order Date :- 28.6.2022 Neetu

¶19

Digitally signed by NEETU SINGH Date: 2022.07.05 12:34:19 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pradeep @ Banti Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradeep @ Banti Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Imran @ Natendar Vs State of U.P.

Shravan Kumar Saroj Vs State of U.P.

Kumud Rai Vs State of Up and Another

Mahipal Singh Vs State of U.P.

Tasleem Ahmad and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ajit Vs State of U.P.