Allowed

Ravindra v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC12 Apr 2022BAIL/1702/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court allowed a bail application filed by Ravindra under the UP Gangster Act. The court held that the applicant has merit on his claim of being falsely implicated and granted bail without observing the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Applicant enlarged on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount subject to specified conditions of innocence and appearance.

Ravindra Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 68

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1702 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Ravindra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dheeraj Kumar Tiwari,Ainul Haq Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.

¶5

By means of this bail application the applicant has prayed to be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 521 of 2021 at Police Station Kakore, District Bulandshahar under Section 2/3 Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant is in jail since 04.08.2021.

¶6

The bail application of the applicant was rejected by learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (Gangster Act), Bulandshahar, on 03.01.2022.

¶7

Sri Shujauddin, learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The applicant has been enlarged on bail in all the three criminal cases depicted in the gang chart. He is not a member of any criminal gang.

¶8

Explaining the criminal history of the applicant learned counsel for the applicant contends that being from economically weaker section of the society the applicant has become an easy scapegoat for the police authorities who have falsely implicated the applicant in the said cases to burnish their credentials. The applicant has never misused the liberty of bail granted to him in the said cases. The said cases do not have

¶9

any bearing on this bail application. The applicant is not a flight risk.

¶10

Shri I.P. Srivastava, learned AGA for the State could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. Learned AGA does not contest the criminal history of the applicant as disclosed in the bail application.

¶11

I see merit in the submissions of learned counsel for the applicant and accordingly hold that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶12

In the light of the preceding discussion and without making any observations on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed.

¶13

Let the applicant- Ravindra be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court below. The following conditions be imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶14

(i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶15

(ii) The applicant will not influence any witness.

¶16

(iii) The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶17

(iv) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade

¶18

him from disclosing such facts to the Court to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶19

In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.

¶20

Order Date :- 12.4.2022 Pravin

¶21

Digitally signed by PRAVIN VERMA Date: 2022.04.13 12:48:12 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ravindra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sheel Kumar Gupta Vs State of U.P.

Deepak Vs State of U.P.

Kuldeep Vs State of U.P.

Rashid Vs State of U.P.

Rakib Vs State of U.P.

Pradeep @ Bittu Vs State of U.P.