In a bail application under Section 307 IPC, the High Court considered the credibility of the injured victim (applicant's nephew) and the applicant's criminal history involving the Arms Act. The Court found reliable evidence of motive and identity, leading to the rejection of the bail plea.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16848 of 2022
Applicant :- Shrinath Maurya Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sangam Lal Kesharwani,Ajay Kumar Tiwari,Shyam Chandra Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mohd. Asim Zulfiquar
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
falsely implicated in the present case.
Order Date :- 8.12.2022 Jaswant
Digitally signed by JASWANT KUMAR Date: 2022.12.12 19:09:25 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in the pending trial for alleged culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
Whether the applicant's criminal history and the credibility of the prosecution witnesses warrant the grant of bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shrinath Maurya
State of U.P.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
