Ajay v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This bail application was dismissed as infructuous because Sri O.P. Rathi, learned counsel for the applicant, stated that the application had become infructuous without further elaboration.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
Court No. - 76
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15900 of 2019
Applicant :- Ajay Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Mishra,Reetika Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
Sri O.P. Rathi, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Manoj Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant states that this bail application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 8.9.2022 G.S
Digitally signed by GHAN SHYAM Date: 2022.09.10 11:02:31 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ajay
Coram
Subhash Chandra Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/15900/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court