Deepak Alias Dipu Vs State of U.P.

Court No. - 75

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15449 of 2022

Applicant :- Deepak Alias Dipu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vimal Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Ravi Prakash, holding the brief of Sri Vimal Kumar, learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

¶6

Applicant- Deepak @ Dipu seeks bail in Case Crime No.35/2022, under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Vishnugarh, District Kannauj.

¶7

It is submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that there is a solitary case against the applicant in the gang chart, particulars of which are mentioned in paragraph no. 7 of the affidavit in support of the bail application, in which the applicant is reported to be on bail, bail order is Annexure-3 to the bail application. It is finally submitted that the applicant claims to have no previous criminal history, is in jail since 2.3.2022, undertakes not to misuse the liberty of bail, trial is not likely to be concluded in the near future, he be enlarged on bail.

¶8

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not demonstrate anything contrary to the above submission.

¶9

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the contentions noted above, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail.

¶10

Let the applicant involved in aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶11

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial

¶12

court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶13

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶16

Order Date :- 24.5.2022 C.Prakash

¶17

Digitally signed by CHANDRA PRAKASH Date: 2022.05.24 17:37:27 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Deepak Alias Dipu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Alias Dipu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Trikha@ Sanjay Vs State of U.P.

Rahul Tiwari Vs State of U.P.

Khalil Vs State of U.P.

Faim Vs State of U.P.

Raju Dubey Vs State of U.P.

Ajay Yadav and Another Vs State of U.P.