While pressing the bail application, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that in the present case, the applicant has been implicated just to create pressure upon him in order to enter into a compromise in the pending Regular Suit No. 837 of 2014 and for this purpose, a criminal colour has been given to a civil dispute. It is stated that the applicant is in possession of the property in suit by virtue of an agreement to sale dated 07.03.2011 and when the sale deed was not executed, the applicant filed Regular Suit No. 837 of 2014, wherein, the owner of the property, Sri J.N. Sharma (Jintendra Nath Sharma) is the defendant. It is stated that to avoid the civil proceedings, the owner of the property, in issue, Sri J.N. Sharma executed power of attorney dated 23.09.2016 in favour of his sons, who thereafter executed a sale deed dated 19.06.2018 in favour of the informant herein and on coming to know about the sale deed and the pending mutation proceedings, the applicant moved an objection dated 29.08.2018 in the mutation proceedings. He further submitted that the applicant after coming to know about the sale deed executed by the power of attorney holder of Sri J.N. Sharma, the owner of the property in issue, also impleaded the informant herein in the Regular Suit thereafter the present FIR has been lodged. The present FIR against the applicant is nothing but an abuse of process of law.
