Asgar @ Kinkin v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant's counsel was absent on the hearing date.
What the court decided
Court No. - 82
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11666 of 2021
Applicant :- Asgar @ Kinkin Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjai Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mayank Kumar Jain,J.
List has been revised.
No one is present on behalf of the applicant.
Learned AGA for the State is present.
The bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 21.9.2022 Mohit
Digitally signed by MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA Date: 2022.09.23 09:53:02 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Asgar @ Kinkin
Coram
Mayank Kumar Jain
Mohit Kumar Kushwaha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/11666/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court