In this application for anticipatory bail, the court held that the offence is punishable with a maximum sentence of seven years. Relying on a previous decision, the court dismissed the application as not maintainable.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 66 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 961 of 2022 Applicant :- Azaz Ahmad Opposite Party :- Union of India Counsel for Applicant :- Salma Bano,Ashok Kumar Srivastava,Surendra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Rajnish Kumar Rai
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
5.. When confronted with above, learned counsel for applicants could not over come the same.
Order Date :- 15.3.2022/YK
Digitally signed by YASHWANT KUMAR Date: 2022.03.15 18:05:41 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present application for anticipatory bail is maintainable under section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with an offence under section 4 of the R.P. U.P. Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Ac
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M/S V. K. Traders Vs. Union of IndiaReferred¶6
M/S V. K. Traders Vs. Union of India and 3 other decided on 08.03.2022
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Azaz Ahmad
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
