Disposed

Nilesh @ Kiran Suryawanshi v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC21 Oct 2022ABAIL/8755/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An anticipatory bail application was withdrawn by the applicant. The High Court directed surrender within six weeks and disposal of a regular bail application in accordance with the Satender Kumar Antil guidelines, staying coercive action during this period.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail dismissed as withdrawn; applicant directed to surrender within six weeks; regular bail application to be decided per Satender Kumar Antil guidelines; coercion stayed.

Nilesh @ Kiran Suryawanshi Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 78

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8755 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Nilesh @ Kiran Suryawanshi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohit Singh,Shikhar Neelkanth Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Shikhar Neelkanth, learned counsel for applicant as well as Sri Viresh Kumar Gupta, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶6

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.159 of 2022, under Sections 498A, 304B I.P.C. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, P.S. Kotwali, District Jhansi.

¶7

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within six weeks from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶10

For the period of six weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶11

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of .

¶12

Order Date :- 21.10.2022 Ravi Kant

¶13

Digitally signed by RAVI KANT Date: 2022.10.21 18:12:58 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Nilesh @ Kiran Suryawanshi v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nilesh @ Kiran Suryawanshi v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lal Bahadur Verma Vs State of U.P.

Rakesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rahul and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ruby Vs State of U.P and Another

Mukesh and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sadan @ Irfan and 3 Others Vs State of U.P.