Dismissed
Praveen Singraur and 4 Others v. State of U.P. Ans 2 Others
Allahabad HCABAIL/8515/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8515 of 2020
Applicant :- Praveen Singraur And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Ans 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ram Bachan Yadav,Ram Sakal Yadav
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Neither learned counsel for the applicant/s nor learned counsel for the informant is present even in the revised call. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
As such, with the efflux of time, the anticipatory bail application seems to have become infructuous.
The same is dismissed for want of prosecution and being infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 29.9.2022 Shalini
Digitally signed by SHALINI JAISWAL Date: 2022.09.30 14:24:37 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Praveen Singraur And 4 Others
Krishan Pahal
Shalini Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court