The applicant argued that the anticipatory bail application had become infructuous. The court dismissed the application on that ground without detailed reasoning.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 74 of 2021
Applicant :- M.S. Ahluwalia Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pushkar Mehrotra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Sri Udai Bhatiya, Advocate holding brief of Sri Aditya Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present anticipatory bail application has now become infructuous.
In view of the statement so made, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 9.12.2022 Ravi Kant
Digitally signed by RAVI KANT Date: 2022.12.09 18:16:05 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
M.S. Ahluwalia
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
