Dileep Diwakar v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal miscellaneous anticipatory bail application, the court dismissed the petition as infructuous on the ground that the applicant had already been arrested.
In a criminal miscellaneous anticipatory bail application, the court dismissed the petition as infructuous on the ground that the applicant had already been arrested.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7059 of 2022
Applicant :- Dileep Diwakar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Monis Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dinesh Mishra
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Mohd. Javed, Advocate holding brief of Sri Mohd Monis, learned counsel for the applicant, submits that applicant has already been arrested, thus, the instant application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 31.8.2022 A. Tripathi
Digitally signed by AKHILESH TRIPATHI Date: 2022.08.31 17:42:24 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dileep Diwakar
State of U.P.
Raj Beer Singh
A. Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court