Gaurav v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., finding the petition infructuous as the applicant had already been arrested.
The court dismissed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., finding the petition infructuous as the applicant had already been arrested.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7006 of 2022
Applicant :- Gaurav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ayub Khan,Mohd Qasim Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rakesh Tripathi I
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rakesh Tripathi-I, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicantaccused has already been arrested, thus, the instant application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 9.11.2022 A. Tripathi
Digitally signed by AKHILESH TRIPATHI Date: 2022.11.09 16:33:07 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gaurav
State of U.P.
Another
Raj Beer Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court