Mohit Kumar Goyal and Another v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
An anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn with the consent of the opposite party on the ground that it had become infructuous.
An anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn with the consent of the opposite party on the ground that it had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6699 of 2021
Applicant :- Mohit Kumar Goyal And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Tandon,Prashant Vyas Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Ms. Kanchan Sharma, Advocate holding brief of Sri Prashant Vyas, learned counsel for the applicants states that this application has become infructuous and she may be permitted to withdraw it.
Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid request.
The application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 15.12.2022 Siddhant
Digitally signed by SIDDHANT SAHU Date: 2022.12.16 10:22:53 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohit Kumar Goyal
Anonymous
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court