This court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail filed under Section 438 CrPC as infructuous because the applicant had already obtained regular bail.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5859 of 2022
Applicant :- Ajay Jaiswal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Kshitiswar Nath Yadav,Dinesh Chandra Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for State are present.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that instant application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous, as applicant has already applied for regular bail hence, the instant application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 4.11.2022 Neeraj
Digitally signed by NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH Date: 2022.11.04 14:36:51 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for anticipatory bail should be dismissed as infructuous since the applicant has already applied for regular bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajay Jaiswal
Raj Beer Singh
Neeraj Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
