This brief order rejects an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed by Somesh Yadav in a case involving sections 498A and 307 IPC. The court found no exceptional circumstances warranting interference despite pending proceedings.
Anticipatory bail application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 511 of 2022
Applicant :- Somesh Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Satyendra Narayan Singh,Pankaj Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Akash Mishra
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
438 Cr.P.C.
Order Date :- 22.3.2022 YK
Digitally signed by YASHWANT KUMAR Date: 2022.03.22 17:29:20 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether exceptional circumstances exist to grant anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of EnforcementReferred¶9
P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Somesh Yadav
State Of U.P
2 Others
Rajeev Misra
Yashwant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
