The anticipatory bail application was rejected for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite the matter being called out twice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 414 of 2020
Applicant :- Gulab Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Vikrant Singh Parihar,Vipul Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
Mr. Pankaj Kumar Tripathi, learned A.G.A. has filed counter affidavit today in Court is taken on record.
This is anticipatory bail application. Perusal of record shows that interim protection was granted by this Court vide order dated 10.1.2020.
List revised. Case called out twice. None appears on behalf of the applicant nor any adjournment slip has been sent.
Learned A.G.A. is present for the State.
The matter pertains to the year 2020.
In view of the above, this anticipatory bail application is rejected for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Office is directed to communicate this order to the court concerned forthwith to proceed further in the matter.
Order Date :- 23.11.2022 Virendra
Digitally signed by VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA Date: 2022.11.24 13:43:41 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Gulab
State Of U.P.
Suresh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
