Rohit v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application sought by Rohit was dismissed as not pressed. The court accepted the no-argument submission of the counsel.
Anticipatory bail application sought by Rohit was dismissed as not pressed. The court accepted the no-argument submission of the counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3546 of 2022
Applicant :- Rohit Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Yadav,Mahendra Pratap Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajendra Kumar Misra
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Shri Mahendra Pratap, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri Rajendra Kumar Misra, learned counsel for the first informant are present.
This Anticipatory Bail Application has been moved by the applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No. 55 of 2022, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 394, 34, I.P.C., P.S. Chandi Nagar, District Baghpat, during the pendency of investigation.
Learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press this application and his application be dismissed as not pressed.
The prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant is accepted.
The application is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 19.5.2022 T. Sinha
Digitally signed by TRIPTI SINHA Date: 2022.05.20 16:43:07 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rohit
State of U.P.
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court