Application for anticipatory bail dismissed for want of prosecution due to absence of applicants' counsel despite listing.
Dismissed the instant application for anticipatory bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 285 of 2021
Applicant :- Kusum Srivastava And Anr. Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Ors. Counsel for Applicant :- Nikhil Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None for the applicants despite taking the case in revised list.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
The instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 12.10.2022 A. Tripathi
Digitally signed by AKHILESH TRIPATHI Date: 2022.10.13 15:22:07 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Kusum Srivastava And Anr.
State Of U.P. And 2 Ors.
Raj Beer Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
