Sabuddin @ Shahbuddin and 8 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous after the arrest of the applicants became known.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous after the arrest of the applicants became known.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2690 of 2022
Applicant :- Sabuddin @ Shahbuddin And 8 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Sri Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Pankaj Kumar Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the present application has become infructuous due to arrest of the applicants.
In view of the above, the present application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 25.5.2022 Ishan
Digitally signed by ISHAN JAISWAL Date: 2022.05.27 10:16:19 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sabuddin @ Shahbuddin And 8 Others
Ishan Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court