Sushil Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2366 of 2022
Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Pandey Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Aman Arya,Jeetendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mahesh Kumar Shukla
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Shivam Yadav, the learned counsel for applicant, the learned AGA for State and Mr. Mahesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for first informant.
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by applicant, Sushil Kumar Pandey in connection with Case Crime No.444 of 2021, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 354, 376, 511, 313 IPC, Police Station Lalpur/Pandeypur, District Varanasi.
Perused the record.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused and also judgment of the Apex Court in the case of P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198 , this Court does not find any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 CrPC.
Accordingly, the present application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
Order Date :- 29.3.2022 Shahroz
Digitally signed by SHAHROJ ALAM Date: 2022.03.31 10:53:52 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of EnforcementDistinguished¶8
P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sushil Kumar Pandey
State of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
Shahroj Alam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court