Manoj v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court rejected an anticipatory bail application filed by an applicant accused of offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 332, 353 IPC and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act.
What did the court decide?
The anticipatory bail application was rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2211 of 2022
Applicant :- Manoj Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Mishra,Pradeep Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J.
Heard Shri Santosh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The present application has been moved by the accusedapplicant- Manoj, in Case Crime No.3 of 2020, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 332, 353 I.P.C. and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Falawada, District Meerut, with the prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel for the applicant while pressing the anticipatory bail application submits that it is a case, where no police personnel sustained any injury and with regard to the same occurrence another F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No.2 of 2020 has been lodged by the informant and in fact in the alleged incident, the applicant and his father were injured.
It is further submitted that the applicant has been made accused in the above mentioned case only on account of his criminal history while all the cases, which have been referred as criminal history of the applicant, were slapped against the applicant without any basis. It is also submitted that the local police is trying hard to arrest the applicant in the above mentioned case without there being any cogent material/evidence against the applicant. The applicant is ready to cooperate in the investigation and therefore, protection from arrest be granted to him.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant considering his criminal history of 13 cases including heinous offences.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Manoj
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/2211/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court