The court consigned the anticipatory bail application to the record, noting that no further cause of action existed as the applicant had already been granted bail on an earlier order dated 5.1.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 19334 of 2021
Applicant :- Ramu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Harish Chandra Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Harish Chandra Dwivedi, learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by applicant Ramu, in connection with Case Crime No. 403 of 2020, under sections 417, 418, 420, 421, 409 I.P.C., P.S. Sigra, District Varanasi.
Perused the record.
Learned counsel for applicant contends that in view of order dated 5.1.2022 no further cause of action survives in the present application as applicant has already been permitted to be enlarged on bail.
In view of above, present application for anticipatory is consigned to the record.
Order Date :- 7.4.2022 HSM
Digitally signed by HARI SHANKER MISHRA Date: 2022.04.21 17:45:56 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramu
State of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
