Sachin v. State of U.P.and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-judge Criminal Misc. order rejecting anticipatory bail application for alleged offenses under IPC, citing lack of exceptional grounds.
Single-judge Criminal Misc. order rejecting anticipatory bail application for alleged offenses under IPC, citing lack of exceptional grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1828 of 2022
Applicant :- Sachin Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pranshu Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Anand Tripathi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Pranshu Gupta, learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by applicant- Sachin in connection with Case Crime No. 18 of 2021, under Sections 323, 325, 354(A)(1)(i), 452, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Railway Road, District- Meerut.
At the very outset, learned A.G.A. submits that charge sheet has already been submitted against applicant on 21.05.2021 in above-mentioned case crime number.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused and also judgment of Apex Court in P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198 , this Court does not find any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the present application for anticipatory bail is rejected .
Order Date :- 11.4.2022 Saif
Digitally signed by SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN Date: 2022.04.13 12:53:12 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198Referred¶8
Sachin
State Of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Rajeev Misra
Parties & counsel