The Criminal Miscellaneous Anticipatory Bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. The court did not treat the matter as part heard or tied up to the Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 16935 of 2021
Applicant :- Sanjeev Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vinod Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
Heard Sri Vinod Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Sri Vinod Singh, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press this Criminal Miscellaneous Anticipatory Bail Application.
Hence, this Criminal Miscellaneous Anticipatory Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn .
It shall not be treated as part heard or tied up to this Bench.
Order Date :- 4.2.2022 Raj
Sanjeev
State of U.P.
Arvind Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
