Akash Sharma v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the applicant had already been arrested in the underlying case.
Court dismissed anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the applicant had already been arrested in the underlying case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 16623 of 2021
Applicant :- Akash Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shreesh Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Sri Shreesh Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the present application has become infructuous as the applicant has been arrested in the present case.
In view of the above, the present application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 8.2.2022 Ishan
Digitally signed by ISHAN JAISWAL Date: 2022.02.09 10:26:33 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Akash Sharma
State of U.P.
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court