Dismissed
Varun v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCABAIL/16168/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 16168 of 2021
Applicant :- Varun Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mahesh Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for State are present.
Sri Anurag, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Mahesh Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant submits that instant application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous, as applicant has already been granted regular bail, hence, the instant application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of aforesaid, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 11.8.2022 Neeraj
Digitally signed by NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH Date: 2022.08.11 17:15:53 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Varun
Raj Beer Singh
Neeraj Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court