Allowed

Karan Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC12 Dec 2022ABAIL/14000/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this anticipatory bail application, the court considered the applicant's plea of innocence and lack of criminal history against serious IPC charges. Finding sufficient merit, the court granted bail on a bond, subject to cooperation with investigation and other standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, no inducement, and permission to leave India.

Karan Singh Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 78

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 14000 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Karan Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Abhijeet Singh,Anupam Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vikrant Rana

¶4

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Anupam Dubey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Vikrant Rana, learned counsel for the first informant and Sri Kulveer Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the records.

¶6

The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Case Crime No.- 0222 of 2021, under Sections 406, 409, 120B IPC, Police Station- Noida Sector 39, DistrictCommissionerate (Gautambudhnagar).

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with a view to cause unnecessary harassment and to victimize him. The applicant was granted interim protection vide order dated 1.9.2021 and has not misused it. The name of the applicant has come up in the statement of named accused person Ayush. The applicant has nothing to do with the said offence. The said statement is not even admissible under the Indian Evidence Act. The investigation is going on. It is further stated that applicant is co-operating in the investigation and is ready to cooperate in future also. There is no likelihood of the applicant repeating the said offence, if any. There is no criminal history and, therefore, he is entitled for protection from this Court.

¶8

Learned Additional Government Advocate and learned counsel for the first informant have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but have not disputed the fact that there is no criminal history of the applicant.

¶9

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the applicant Karan Singh deserves to be granted anticipatory bail in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶10

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed with following directions:-

¶11

(A) In the event of arrest of the applicant involved in aforesaid case shall be released on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report, if any, under section 173(2) Cr.P.C. before the competent Court on his/her furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned;

¶12

(B) The applicant shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer during investigation and shall report to the Investigating Officer as and when required for the purpose of conducting investigation;

¶13

(C) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and

¶14

(D) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.

¶15

In default or misuse of any of the conditions, the Public Prosecutor/ Investigating Officer/ first informant-complainant is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶16

Order Date :- 12.12.2022 Shalini

¶17

Digitally signed by SHALINI JAISWAL Date: 2022.12.14 10:29:21 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Karan Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karan Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shakeel Ahmad Vs State of U.P.

M.S. Ahluwalia Vs State of U.P. and Another

M.S. Ahluwalia Vs State of U.P. and Another

Nagendra Vs State of U.P.

Mohd Aslam Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shankar Lal and 3 Others Vs State of U.P.