Disposed

Sachin and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC7 Dec 2022ABAIL/12078/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous anticipatory bail application, the court granted protection against coercive action for four weeks and directed the applicants to surrender, wherein a regular bail application would be decided per the Supreme Court's Satender Kumar Antil guidelines.

What did the court decide?

No coercive action against applicants for four weeks; directed to surrender for regular bail application.

Sachin and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 78

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12078 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Sachin And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for applicants as well as Sri Vibhav Anand Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶6

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No. 0340 of 2022, under sections 323, 308, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Atrauliya, district Azamgarh.

¶7

After arguing for some time, applicants' counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicants.

¶9

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that the applicants shall surrender before the concerned court below within four weeks from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).

¶10

For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants- Sachin, Guddu and Vishnu in the above case.

¶11

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 7.12.2022 Shalini

¶13

Digitally signed by SHALINI JAISWAL Date: 2022.12.08 10:06:10 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sachin and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Salman and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Aamir Vs State of U.P. and Another

Narayan Das Prajapati Vs State of U.P.and Another

Saurabh Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ramanand Vs State of U.P.

Sabir and Another Vs State of U.P.