Anupam @ Maunu Mishra v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The Hon'ble Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as not pressed by the learned counsel for the applicant.
The Hon'ble Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as not pressed by the learned counsel for the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11979 of 2021
Applicant :- Anupam @ Maunu Mishra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Satyendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Anjeet Singh,Bhagwan Das
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Satyendra Kumar Mishra submits that he wants to not press the anticipatory bail application and the same may be dismissed as not pressed.
Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 11.7.2022 Om.
Digitally signed by OM PRAKASH MISHRA Date: 2022.07.12 14:01:44 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anupam @ Maunu Mishra
State of U.P.
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court