Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous following the finalization of the police report. No substantive legal issues addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11679 of 2021
Applicant :- Madan And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Praveen Kumar Srivastava,Vindeshwari Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Mr Arvind Kumar Sahu, Advocate holding brief of Sri Vindeshwari Prasad, learned counsel for the applicants contended that final report has been filed in the matter and the application may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 24.5.2022 RavindraKSingh
Digitally signed by RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH Date: 2022.05.24 14:58:45 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Madan And 2 Others
State of U.P.
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
