Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous since the applicant was already arrested.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11382 of 2022
Applicant :- Ramji Tiwari Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Satyendra Narayan Singh,Pankaj Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ram Chandra Solanki
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Sri Ram Chandra Solanki, learned counsel for the informant is present.
Sri Saurabh Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Sri Pankaj Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present anticipatory bail application has now become infructuous as the applicant has been arrested.
In view of the statement so made, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
The certified copy of the orders and other relevant documents shall be returned to the counsel for the applicant as per the Rules of the High Court after obtaining photostat copies, which shall be kept on record.
Order Date :- 29.11.2022 Ravi Kant
Digitally signed by RAVI KANT Date: 2022.11.29 17:04:22 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramji Tiwari
Krishan Pahal
Ravi Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
