Disposed

Harendra @ Harvindra and 2 Others v. State of U.P and Another

Allahabad HC1 Nov 2022ABAIL/10580/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Simultaneous anticipatory bail application by three accusedpersons attracted under IPC Sections 323, 504, 326. Court allowed withdrawal with liberty to file regular bail, directing surrender within four weeks to avoid coercive action, citing Supreme Court guidelines.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file regular bail; applicants directed to surrender within four weeks; coercive action stayed pending surrender.

Harendra @ Harvindra and 2 Others Vs State of U.P and… — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 78

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10580 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Harendra @ Harvindra And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pravina Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Pravina Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for applicants and Sri Vibhav Anand Singh, learned A.G.A. for State and also perused the material available on record.

¶6

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to FIR/Case Crime No. 9 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504, 326, 325 I.P.C., P.S.- Purkaji, District- Muzaffar Nagar.

¶7

After arguing for some time, applicants' counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922 .

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicants.

¶9

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that the applicants shall surrender before the concerned court below within a period of four weeks from today and in case, a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶10

For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants- Harendra @ Harvindra, Rupin and Govind , in the above case.

¶11

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 1.11.2022 Siddhant

¶13

Digitally signed by SIDDHANT SAHU Date: 2022.11.01 17:02:29 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Harendra @ Harvindra and 2 Others v. State of U.P and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harendra @ Harvindra and 2 Others v. State of U.P and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sushil @ Ramu Vs State of U.P.

Gopal Krishna Tiwari @ Ashutosh Tiwari Vs State of U.P and Another

Monish Vs State of U.P. and Another

Kamini Chaudhary Vs State of U.P.

Nekhram Vs State of U.P.

Movajjam Khan Vs State of U.P. and Another