Disposed

Rolu Yadav and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC28 Jul 2022A482/825/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court held that the applicants should move a bail application under the guidelines of Satendra Kumar Antil within one month. No coercive action was taken for that period, and the Section 482 application was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Orders applicants to appear and file bail application within one month; no coercive action against them during that period; Section 482 application finally disposed of.

Rolu Yadav and Another Vs State of U.P. and… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 64

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 825 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Rolu Yadav And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Yadvesh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the charge sheet dated 30.01.2021, cognizance order dated 07.06.2021, passed by the Judicial Magistrate-III, Varanasi as well as entire proceedings of Case No.10064 of 2021, State versus Rolu Yadav and others, arising out of Case Crime No. 0594 of 2020, under Sections - 354, 323, 504, 506, 325, 452, 427 I.P.C., Police Station - Chaubepur, District - Varanasi, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate-III, Varanasi.

¶7

At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicants relinquish the prayer for quashment and wish to move bail application before the trial court in view of the guidelines / observations given by Hon'ble The Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in ( 2021) 10 SCC 773 .

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection.

¶9

Considering the above submissions and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that in case the applicants appear before the court concerned within one month from today and move application for bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of in terms of the guidelines / observations given by Hon'ble The Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in ( 2021) 10 SCC 773 .

¶10

For a period of one month from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants.

¶11

It is made clear that in the event no such application is moved within the time prescribed above, this order will be of no avail to the applicants.

¶12

With the above direction, the instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of .

¶13

Order Date :- 28.7.2022 S Rawat

¶14

Digitally signed by SHOBHIT RAWAT Date: 2022.07.30 15:43:51 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rolu Yadav and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rolu Yadav and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankar Lal Vs State of U.P. and Another

Om Prakash and Another Vs State of Up and 2 Others

Abhishek and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Satendra Prasad Vs State of U.P. and Another

Lakhpat and 5 Others Vs State of U.P and Another

Jitendra @ Jitendra Singh Vs State of U.P and 3 Others