Dismissed

Kamlesh Singh and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC16 Jul 2022A482/7597/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An application under Section 482 CrPC was filed to quash a FIR. The High Court held that since the offences were cognizable and required personal attendance, the delay prevents immediate quashing. Consequently, the application was dismissed with liberty to file a fresh application and the direction for a remand warrant has been recalled.

What did the court decide?

The application for quash was dismissed in terms of the previous order, with liberty to file another application within three months upon advance of the previous order, and the direction for remand wa

Kamlesh Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 83

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7597 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Kamlesh Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bishram Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

vkosndx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 140 lu 2019] vUrxZr /kkjk 307 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk ijhf{krx<+] ftyk esjB ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 1130 lu 2020 esa ,0lh0ts0,e0&3] esjB }kjk ikfjr rych vkns’k fn0 18&1&2021 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ dks Jo.kksijkUr] i=koyh ds ifj’khyu ls] U;k;ky; us ik;k fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa yxk, x, vkjksi ,d laKs; vijk/k ds deh’ku dk [kqyklk djrs gSa vkSj og vkjksi] dh x;h foospuk ds mijkUr yxk, x, gSa] mu vkjksiksa dks bl U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds rgr viuh 'kfDr dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] tkWp ds nkSjku ,d= dh x;h lkexzh ds vkjksiksa dh 'kq)rk vkSj fo’oluh;rk dk vkdyu djus dh vko’;drk ugha gS] bl Lrj ij vfHk;qDr ds fookfnr cpko ij fopkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA rnuqlkj vkjksi i= ;k mijksDr okn dh dk;Zokgh dks jnn djus dh izkFkZuk vkSj ifj.kkeh dk;Zokgh vLohd`r dh tkrh gSA

¶8

bl Lrj ij] vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk vuqjks/k gS fd vkosndx.k dks vHkh rd mijksDr ekeys esa fxjQrkj ugha fd;k x;k gS vkSj iqfyl vkosnd dks fxjQrkj djus ds iz;kl esa gS] vkSj lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; }kjk vkosndx.k ds f[kykQ n.MkRed izfdz;k tkjh dh tk ldrh gS] blfy, vkosndx.k ds tekur vkosnu i= ij fopkj djus ds fy, lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks funsZ’k tkjh dj fn;k tk;A

¶9

ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another ( Apecial Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021 ds izdj.k dks vkns’k fn0 7&10&2021 }kjk igys gh tekur gsrq fn’kk funsZ’k nsrs gq, fuLrkfjr fd;k tk pqdk gS] blds i’pkr~ vc lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks tekur nsus ds fy, muds foosd vkSj fopkj dks fu;af=r djus okys oS/kkfud izkfo/kkuksa dks izHkkfor fd, fcuk] bl U;k;ky; }kjk dksbZ fof’k"V funsZ’k tkjh djus dh vko’;drk ugha gS] D;ksafd ;g vis{kk dh tkrh gS fd lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; vkosnd ds tekur izkFkZuk i= dks fuLrkfjr djrs le; ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk igys ls tkjh vko’;d fn’kkfunsZ’kksa dks /;ku esa j[ksxkA

¶10

mijksDr fVIif.k;ksa ds lkFk] ;g vkosnu i= vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA fn0 % 16&7&2022 ds0lh0flag

¶11

Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.07.16 16:02:11 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Kamlesh Singh and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamlesh Singh and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prosenjit Roy Vs State of U.P and Another

Subes Kumar Shahi @ Sunni and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashish Mishra Vs State of U.P. and Another

Imam Khan and Another Vs State of U.P and Another

Sundar Pal Thakur @ Sundar Pal Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Raghuveer Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another