The High Court granted an expedited hearing for an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings, holding that conditions exist for adjournment and emphasizing the need for a speedy disposal.
Application stayed for five days; matter remanded to the High Court for an expeditious hearing under specific conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 86
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 736 of 2022
Applicant :- Vijay Bahtia And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Mullick Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
vkosndx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] ifjokn okn la0 3843 lu 2019] vUrxZr /kkjk 406 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk lnj cktkj] ftyk esjB esa ,0lh0ts0,e0&3] esjB }kjk ikfjr rych vkns’k fn0 12&11&2019 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA
vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd bl izdj.k esa i{kdkjksa ds e/; lqyg le>kSrk gks tkus dh laHkkouk gS] blfy, bl izdj.k dks lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; ds lqyg le>kSrk dsUnz dks jsQj dj fn;k tk;A
fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks mudk ;g vuqjks/k Lohdkj fd, tkus esa dksbZ vkifRr ugha gSA
ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds n`f"Vxr bl izdj.k esa ;g funsZf’kr fd;k tkrk gS fd nksuksa i{kdkj lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksdj ekeys dks lqyg le>kSrk ds }kjk fuLrkfjr djus ds fy, vkosnu i= izLrqr djsaA ;fn izdj.k dks lqyg le>kSrk ds vk/kkj ij fuLrkfjr djus ds laca/k esa vkosnu i= voj U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr fd;k tkrk gS rks lacaf/kr U;k;ky; }kjk vkosnu i= izLrqr fd, tkus dh frfFk ls ,d lIrkg ds vUnj ml ij mfpr vkns’k ikfjr fd;k tk; rFkk lacaf/kr ehfM,s’ku lsUVj }kjk mls 4 ekg ds vUnj fuLrkfjr dj fn;k tk;A
vkt ls 5 ekg rd vkosndx.k ds fo:) mijksDr okn esa leLr vfxze dk;Zokgh LFkfxr jgsxhA
;gkW ij ;g Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn i{kdkjksa ds e/; mDr ehfM,s’ku dh izfdz;k foQy gksrh gS rks lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; mijksDr okn esa vkosndx.k ds fo:) fu;ekuqlkj fof/kd dk;Zokgh djus dks Lora= gS] vkSj ;fn i{kdkjksa ds e/; mDr ehfM,s’ku dh izfdz;k lQy gksrh gS rks vkosndx.k ehfM,s’ku lsUVj dh ml vk[;k ds lkFk bl U;k;ky; esa vkus dks Lora= gSaA
mijksDr vH;qfDr ds lkFk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr izLrqr fd;k x;k ;g vkosnu i= vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA
fn0 % 29&3&2022 ds0lh0flag
Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.03.29 17:29:57 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for quashing proceedings is maintainable and requires an expedited hearing.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijay Bahtia And Another
State of U.P. and Another
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
