CrPC S. 482 application filed quashing proceedings was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant withdrew the application. The court recorded no substantive legal proposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6301 of 2022
Applicant :- Kallu Ya@ Sudhir Singh Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilesh Singh,Shivam Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Sri Ankit Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Sri Shivam Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant has stated that he does not wish to press this application as it has rendered infructuous. He, therefore, prayed that this application be dismissed as infructuous.
Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid request.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 15.9.2022 Siddhant
Digitally signed by SIDDHANT SAHU Date: 2022.09.16 16:32:44 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Kallu Ya@ Sudhir Singh Yadav
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
