Disposed

Sandeep Singh Faujdar and Another v. State of U.P.and Another

Allahabad HC20 May 2022A482/5889/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court refused the applicant's request to quash the summoning order on merits as the challenge was given up. However, granting protection to surrender before the lower court, the judge directed the applicant to surrender within four weeks and ordered expedite bail disposal per Satender Kumar Antil guidelines, keeping a bailable warrant in abeyance.

What did the court decide?

Protection granted to surrender within four weeks; bailable warrant kept in abeyance; bail application to be disposed expeditiously.

Sandeep Singh Faujdar and Another Vs State… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 42

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5889 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Sandeep Singh Faujdar And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mukesh Chandra Gupta,Jai Ram Nishad

¶4

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P./opposite party no.1 and perused the record.

¶7

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant to quash the summoning order dated 12.01.2018 in Complaint Case No.692 of 2015, under Sections 447, 448, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Loha Mandi, District Agra.

¶8

At the outset learned counsel for the applicant gave up his challenge to the aforesaid summoning order dated 12.01.2018 and criminal proceedings against the applicant and confined his submission requesting to grant some protection to the applicant to surrender before the concerned court below. The learned counsel for the applicant further stated at the Bar that he is not pressing any other prayer made in this application on merits and prayed that a direction may be issued to the concerned courts below to consider and decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. submits that in case the applicant is not pressing the relief as sought for by him on merits and wants to surrender before the concerned court below, he has no objection if the Court grants protection to him for a short period.

¶10

In view of the above, the relief as sought by the applicant in the instant application is refused.

¶11

However considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within four weeks from today and in case he applies for bail, the bail application of the applicant shall be disposed of expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law and keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

¶12

and another, reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922.

¶13

For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned Court below, whichever is earlier, bailable warrant dated 06.08.2021 shall be kept in abeyance.

¶14

With the above observations and directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of.

¶15

Order Date :- 20.5.2022 Meenu

¶16

Digitally signed by MEENU SINGH Date: 2022.05.20 18:01:08 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sandeep Singh Faujdar and Another v. State of U.P.and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep Singh Faujdar and Another v. State of U.P.and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitendra Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shahid and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Dhirendra Vs State of U.P. and Another

Priyodeep Halder Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ram Kishor and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Subhash and 3 Others Vs State of U.P and Another