The Allahabad High Court Court No. 86, by Gautam Chowdhary J., rejected the applicant's motion to quash an FIR under Section 482 CrPC in a money-laundering case as premature pending a Supreme Court stay reference.
The application for quashing the FIR was rejected as premature pending the Supreme Court's final order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 86
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5805 of 2022
Applicant :- Yogendra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shiv Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] ifjokn okn la0 972 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 494 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk Hkksxuhiqj] ftyk dkuiqj nsgkr] tks flfoy tt] tw0fM0@ tqMhf’k;y eftLVzsV] Hkksxuhiqj] dkuiqj nsgkr ds U;k;ky; edsa yfEcr gS] ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ dks Jo.kksijkUr] i=koyh ds ifj’khyu ls] U;k;ky; us ik;k fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa yxk, x, vkjksi ,d laKs; vijk/k ds deh’ku dk [kqyklk djrs gSa vkSj og vkjksi] dh x;h foospuk ds mijkUr yxk, x, gSa] mu vkjksiksa dks bl U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds rgr viuh 'kfDr dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] tkWp ds nkSjku ,d= dh x;h lkexzh ds vkjksiksa dh 'kq)rk vkSj fo’oluh;rk dk vkdyu djus dh vko’;drk ugha gS] bl Lrj ij vfHk;qDr ds fookfnr cpko ij fopkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA rnuqlkj vkjksi i= ;k mijksDr okn dh dk;Zokgh dks jnn djus dh izkFkZuk vkSj ifj.kkeh dk;Zokgh vLohd`r dh tkrh gSA
bl Lrj ij] vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk vuqjks/k gS fd vkosnd dks vHkh rd mijksDr ekeys esa fxjQrkj ugha fd;k x;k gS vkSj iqfyl vkosnd dks fxjQrkj djus ds iz;kl esa gS] vkSj lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; }kjk vkosnd ds f[kykQ n.MkRed izfdz;k tkjh dh tk ldrh gS] blfy, vkosnd ds tekur vkosnu i= ij fopkj djus ds fy, lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks funsZ’k tkjh dj fn;k tk;A
ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of
Investigation and another ( Apecial Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021 ds izdj.k dks vkns’k fn0 7&10&2021 }kjk igys gh tekur gsrq fn’kk funsZ’k nsrs gq, fuLrkfjr fd;k tk pqdk gS] blds i’pkr~ vc lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks tekur nsus ds fy, muds foosd vkSj fopkj dks fu;af=r djus okys oS/kkfud izkfo/kkuksa dks izHkkfor fd, fcuk] bl U;k;ky; }kjk dksbZ fof’k"V funsZ’k tkjh djus dh vko’;drk ugha gS] D;ksafd ;g vis{kk dh tkrh gS fd lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; vkosnd ds tekur izkFkZuk i= dks fuLrkfjr djrs le; ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk igys ls tkjh vko’;d fn’kkfunsZ’kksa dks /;ku esa j[ksxkA
mijksDr fVIif.k;ksa ds lkFk] ;g vkosnu i= vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA fn0 % 26&4&2022 ds0lh0flag
Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.04.28 16:39:23 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court Court No. 86 Allahabad can quash the FIR in a money-laundering case before the Supreme Court grants interim stay?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. CBIReferred¶9
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (Apecial Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Yogendra Singh
State of U.P.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
