In this application under Section 482 CrPC, the Allahabad High Court quashed a final order not directing the arrest of the applicant. The Court held the order valid under Section 5 of the U.P. Criminal Procedure Act, 2022.
Final order not directing the applicant's arrest was quashed under Section 482 CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 86
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3677 of 2022
Applicant :- Kamlesh Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ratnesh Kumar Jaiswal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] QkStnjh okn la0 26 lu 2021] Fkkuk foU/;kpy] ftyk fetkZiqj esa Lis’ky tt] ,l0lh0@,l0Vh0 ,sDV }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 1&9&2021 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; ds iz’uxr vkns’k fn0 1&9&2021 }kjk vkosnd dk vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 156 (3) na0iz0la0 ifjokn ds :i esa ntZ djus dk funsaZ’k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] tcfd bls ifjokn ds :i esa ntZ djus dk vkns’k vuqfpr gS] blfy, iz’uxr vkns’k =qfViw.kZ gS ,oa vikLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA
fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us muds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k fd;kA
eSaus fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ,oa iz’uxr vkns’k dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds n`f"Vxr ;g vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk QkStnjh okn la0 26 lu 2021] Fkkuk foU/;kpy] ftyk fetkZiqj esa Lis’ky tt] ,l0lh0@,l0Vh0 ,sDV }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 1&9&2021 vikLr fd;k tkrk gSA vkosnu i= la0 12864 lu 2021] lksuh nsoh olsZl LVsV vkQ ;w0ih0 ,.M vnlZ esa bl U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 7&4&2022 esa izfrikfnr fof/k fl)kUrksa ds vuq:i] vkosnd lacaf/kr Fkkus esa fyf[kr :i ls viuh izkFkfedh ,l0lh0@,l0Vh0 ,sDV ds fu;e 5(1) ds vUrxZr ntZ djkus dks Lora= gS vkSj ;fn lacaf/kr Fkkus ij mldh izkFkfedh ntZ ugha dh tkrh gS rks og ,l0lh0@,l0Vh0 ,sDV ds fu;e 5(3) ds vUrxZr vkosnu i= lacaf/kr iqfyl v/kh{kd ds le{k izLrqr dj ldrk gS] vkSj mlds }kjk ,slk vkosnu i= izLrqr djus ij lacaf/kr iqfyl v/kh{kd }kjk ,l0lh0@,l0Vh0 ,sDV dh /kkjk 5(3) dk vuqikyu lqfuf’pr fd;k tk,xkA fn0 % 11&4&2022 ds0lh0flag
Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.04.13 12:09:27 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the final order not directing arrest of the applicant under Section 5(1) of the UP CrP is invalid and quashable under Section 482 CrPC.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Kamlesh Kumar
State Of U.P.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
