Disposed

Rajesh Dutta Pandey v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC13 Jul 2022A482/3382/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the trial court to decide the applicant's pending bail application in accordance with the principles laid down in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI, provided the applicant appears within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction that the trial court decide the bail application based on law in Satender Kumar Antil if the applicant applies within two weeks.

Rajesh Dutta Pandey Vs State of U.P. and Another — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 84

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3382 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Rajesh Dutta Pandey Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,J.P.N. Singh

¶4

Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.

¶5

None appeared on behalf of the opposite party no.2 even in the revised call.

¶6

Heard Sri Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned AGA-I for the State and perused the record of the case.

¶7

By way of the present application, the applicant made a prayer to quash the charge-sheet dated 21.02.2019, cognizance order dated 19.11.2020 arising out of Case Crime No.2531 of 2017, under Sections 419, 468 IPC, Police Station Kotwali, District Ballia pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ballia.

¶8

Sri Raj Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press the prayer made in the application. He confines his prayer only to the extent that a direction be given to the court concerned to decide the bail application of the applicant in the light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Breau of Investigation, reported in 2021 (10) SCC 773.

¶9

Learned AGA is having no objection, if such a direction is given to the court concerned to decide the bail application of the applicant in the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).

¶10

Accordingly, it is directed that if applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and apply for bail then, his bail application shall be decided by the court below on the basis of law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).

¶11

With these direction/observation, the present application is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 13.7.2022 AK Pandey

¶13

Digitally signed by ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY Date: 2022.07.18 09:54:56 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajesh Dutta Pandey v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Dutta Pandey v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Maya Devi Vs State of U.P.and Another

Dushyant Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Ram Ruchi Vs State of U.P.and Another

Tahir Vs State of U.P and Another

Kiran Vs State of U.P and Another

Prem Pal and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another