Disposed

Sachin and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC16 Dec 2022A482/33496/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge High Court allowed a rehearing application under Section 482 CrPC. The court held that since the Supreme Court granted stay in a related matter and the High Court will consider the record while deciding the rehearing application, separate expedited hearing for rehearing is not required.

What did the court decide?

Application for rehearing registered and disposed of; no direction for expedited hearing ordered.

Sachin and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 87

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33496 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Sachin And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Saurabh Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

vkosndx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 31 lu 2019] vUrxZr /kkjk 336] 429 504 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk dfEiy] ftyk Q:Z[kkckn esa izsf"kr vkjksi i= fn0 25&7&2019 ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 1099 lu 2021 esa U;kf;d eftLVzsV] dk;exat] ftyk Q:Z[kkckn }kjk ikfjr izlaKku vkns’k fn0 14&9&2021 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ dks Jo.kksijkUr] i=koyh ds ifj’khyu ls] U;k;ky; us ik;k fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa yxk, x, vkjksi ,d laKs; vijk/k ds deh’ku dk [kqyklk djrs gSa vkSj og vkjksi] dh x;h foospuk ds mijkUr yxk, x, gSa] mu vkjksiksa dks bl U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds rgr viuh 'kfDr dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] tkWp ds nkSjku ,d= dh x;h lkexzh ds vkjksiksa dh 'kq)rk vkSj fo’oluh;rk dk vkdyu djus dh vko’;drk ugha gS] bl Lrj ij vfHk;qDr ds fookfnr c;ko ij fopkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA rnuqlkj vkjksi i= ;k mijksDr okn dh dk;Zokgh dks jnn djus dh izkFkZuk vkSj ifj.kkeh dk;Zokgh vLohd`r dh tkrh gSA

¶8

bl Lrj ij] vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk vuqjks/k gS fd vkosndx.k dks vHkh rd mijksDr ekeys esa fxjQrkj ugha fd;k x;k gS vkSj iqfyl vkosndx.k dks fxjQrkj djus ds iz;kl esa gS] vkSj lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; }kjk vkosndx.k ds f[kykQ n.MkRed izfdz;k tkjh dh tk ldrh gS] blfy, vkosndx.k ds tekur vkosnu i= ij fopkj djus ds fy, lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks funsZ’k tkjh dj fn;k tk;A

¶9

ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another ( Apecial Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021 ds izdj.k dks vkns’k fn0 7&10&2021 }kjk igys gh tekur gsrq fn’kk funsZ’k nsrs gq, fuLrkfjr fd;k tk pqdk gS] blds i’pkr~ vc lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks tekur nsus ds fy, muds foosd vkSj fopkj dks fu;af=r djus okys oS/kkfud izkfo/kkuksa dks izHkkfor fd, fcuk] bl U;k;ky; }kjk dksbZ fof’k"V funsZ’k tkjh djus dh vko’;drk ugha gS] D;ksafd ;g vis{kk dh tkrh gS fd lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; vkosnd ds tekur izkFkZuk i= dks fuLrkfjr djrs le; ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk igys ls tkjh vko’;d fn’kkfunsZ’kksa dks /;ku esa j[ksxkA

¶10

mijksDr fVIif.k;ksa ds lkFk] ;g vkosnu i= vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA fn0 % 16&12&2022 ds0lh0flag

¶11

Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.12.16 18:03:10 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sachin and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Haji Anees and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashutosh Agrawal and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shivam Goyal and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Nakshey Ali and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Deepak Raj Sharma Vs State of U.P. and Another