nitin Vs State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 86

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3066 of 2022

Applicant :- Nitin Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sujata Choudhary,Mohit Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶6

This applicants, through the present application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with a prayer to quash the impugned order dated 2.12.2021 passed by the A.D.J./ FTC-I, Meerut by which the learned court refused the opportunity of the applicant to adduce further evidence in support of his defence and pleased to direct the learned court below to provide an opportunity to the applicant to produce the further evidence in his defence.

¶7

From the perusal of the order sheet it transpires that there were 14 dates but the evidence was not given by the accused. It also feels that deliberately the accused the delaying the trial.

¶8

After having heard the learned counsel for the parties present and perused the impugned order as well as material brought on record, I am of the view that impugned order is based upon relevant consideration and supported by cogent reason, the same does not suffer from any irregularity, illegality or jurisdictional error, hence, no interference is required by this Court. The prayer for quashing the impugned order is refused.

¶9

The application lacks merit. It is liable to be dismissed and is, accordingly dismissed.

¶10

Order Date :- 28.4.2022

¶11

RPD

¶12

Digitally signed by RATAN PRAKASH DWIVEDI Date: 2022.04.29 16:52:18 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

nitin v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

nitin v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Shakuntla Vs State of U.P.and 2 Others

Ravi Shankar Dohaliya and 2 Others Vs State of U.P Thru Secretary Home Lknw. and Another

Ashish Kumar and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Chanda Bee Vs State of U.P. Thru Principal Secy. Min. of Home and Ors.

Vishal Rastogi and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Rookmini Devi Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others