Disposed

Rajjan Singh and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC16 Sept 2022A482/28363/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the trial court to decide the applicants' bail application based on the legal principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil cases, without the applicants pressing for quashing the cognizance order.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the trial court to decide the bail application of the applicants on the basis of law laid down by the Apex Court in the cases of Satender Kumar Antil.

Rajjan Singh and Another Vs State of U.P… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 28363 of 2022 Applicant :- Rajjan Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Kumar Bajpai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.

¶3

Heard Sri Arun Kumar Bajpai, learned counsel for the applicants, Dr. S.B. Maurya, learned AGA-I for the State and perused the record of the case.

¶4

By way of the present application, the applicants made a prayer to quash the cognizance order dated 30.04.2022 and proceeding of Case No. 12180 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime No. 205 of 2020, under Sections 452, 323, 504, 354 IPC, Police Station Ghazipur, District Fatehpur pending in the court of Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C. (C.A.W.), Fatehpur.

¶5

Learned counsel for the applicants does not want to press the prayer made in the application. He confines his prayer only to the extent that a direction be given to the court concerned to decide the bail application of the applicants in the light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the cases of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Breau of Investigation, reported in 2021 (10) SCC 773 and Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Breau of Investigation and others MANU/SC/0851/2022.

¶6

Learned AGA is having no objection, if such a direction is given to the court concerned to decide the bail application of the applicants in the light of the judgments of the Apex Court in the cases of Satender Kumar Antil (supras).

¶7

Accordingly, it is directed that if applicants appear before the trial court within three weeks from today and apply for bail then, their bail application shall be decided by the court below on the basis of law laid down by the Apex Court in the cases of Satender Kumar Antil (supras).

¶8

With these direction/observation, the present application is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶9

Order Date :- 16.9.2022 AK Pandey

¶10

Digitally signed by ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY Date: 2022.09.17 10:43:42 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajjan Singh and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajjan Singh and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Farman Chirodiya Vs State of U.P. and Another

Love Dubey Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rajendra Prasad Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another

Manager Mehram Singh @ Mehram Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Munisha Devi Vs State of U.P.and Another

Smt Neetu Vs State of U.P. and Another