Smt. Nisha Srivastava v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The application under Section 482 of CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear. The interim order dated 06.09.2016 was vacated.
The application under Section 482 of CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear. The interim order dated 06.09.2016 was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 88
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 26981 of 2016
Applicant :- Smt. Nisha Srivastava Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Srivastava,Rakesh Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.
Case is taken up in the revised call. No one appears for the applicant. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
In view of the above, this application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order dated 06.09.2016 stands vacated.
Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 10.11.2022
MN/-
Digitally signed by MAHENDRA NATH Date: 2022.11.11 15:06:26 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Nisha Srivastava
Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court