The submission regarding the summoning order that it was on a printed proforma and has been passed without application of judicious mind, also appears to be incorrect for the reason that the Magistrate has to apply his mind to the facts and the statements and as per the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Mehmood Ul Rehman vs. Khazir Mohammad Tunda [(2015) 12 SCC 420] wherein it has been held that it should reflect that the Magistrate has applied his mind to the facts and the statements and he is satisfied that there is ground for proceeding further in the matter. The satisfaction on the ground for proceeding would mean that the facts alleged in the complaint would constitute an offence, and when considered along with the statements recorded, would prima facie, make the accused answerable before the court. It has been further held that no doubt, no formal order or a speaking order is required to be passed at that stage. Similar is the case here, the Magistrate while passing the summoning order was satisfied on the basis of the contents of the FIR, charge-sheet and the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. In the impugned order, there is a mention that the documents and the chargesheet filed by the Police were seen and after that the court below found that the material is sufÏcient and has issued the summoning order; it is well settled at the stage of summoning of accused, the concerned court below shall not go into the merit or demerit of the case, it shall only
