Allowed

Mohit and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC21 Oct 2022A482/24228/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court considered an application under Section 482 CrPC wherein the applicant indicated a settlement. The Court reviewed settled SC precedents and allowed the comprehensive quashing of the departmental proceeding due to the settlement.

What did the court decide?

The comprehensive departmental proceeding was quashed following the applicant's submission of a settlement and representation to the Supreme Court.

Mohit and 2 Others Vs State of U.P… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 87

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 24228 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Mohit And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- B.N.Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

vkosndx.k }kjk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 95 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 452] 323] 504] 506 Hkk0n a 0fo0] Fkkuk Mdksj] ftyk tkykSu ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 668 lu 2020] tks U;kf;d eftLVzsV] tkykSu ,V mjbZ ds U;k;ky; esa yfEcr gS] ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd i{kdkjksa ds e/; vkil esa lqyg le>kSrk gks x;k gS rFkk os bl okn dks vkxs ugha pykuk pkgrs gSa] blfy, mijksDr okn dh laiw.kZ dk;Zokgh dks vikLr dj fn;k tk;A vius rdZ ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675, Narinder Singh & Ors Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. 2014 Law Suit (SC) 202, Yogendra Yadav & Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr, Dimpey Gujral W/o Vivek Gujral & Ors Vs. Union Territory & Ors esa ikfjr uthjksa dh vksj U;k;ky; dk /;ku vkd`"V djk;kA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd i{kdkjksa ds chp gq, le>kSrkukek dks lR;kfir djus gsrq voj U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k x;k Fkk rFkk voj U;k;ky; dh vk[;k fn0 17&9&2022 ds vuqlkj voj U;k;ky; }kjk le>kSrk rlnhd fd;k tk pqdk gS] tks i=koyh ij miyC/k gSA

¶8

mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa dks lquus rFkk i=koyh ,oa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; dh mijksdr uthjksa dk ifj'khyu djus ds i’pkr /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr izLrqr fd;k x;k vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶9

rn~uqlkj ;g vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk mijksDr of.kZr okn dh laiw.kZ dk;Zokgh vikLr dh tkrh gSA

¶10

vUrfje vkns’k ;fn dksbZ gks rks mls lekIr le>k tk;A

¶11

dk;kZy; dks funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns'k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf'pr djsA fn0% 21&10&2022

¶12

ds0lh0flag

¶13

Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.10.21 14:39:44 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mohit and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohit and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashfak Kha and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Nafees Jahan Vs Vizarat Nabi

Smt. Gulnaz Begum Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Vipin and 5 Others Vs State of U.P.

Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Mohammad Razique Ansari Vs State of U.P. and Another